Swiss GAAP FER: when they are needed
Accounting kept under the Code of Obligations is enough for the vast majority of Swiss businesses. But it does not always tell the economic truth: the CO allows hidden reserves, accelerated depreciation and prudent valuations that compress real net worth. When you need financial statements that show the actual situation of the company to investors, banks or outside shareholders, the Swiss GAAP FER come into play — the Swiss reporting standard based on a “true and fair” image.
What Swiss GAAP FER are
Swiss GAAP FER (in German Swiss GAAP FER, in French Swiss GAAP RPC) are a body of accounting recommendations developed in Switzerland that impose the principle of a true and fair view: the financial statements must reflect the real situation of assets, finances and earnings, without the distortions permitted by the prudential logic of the CO.
Compared with international IFRS, FER are leaner, cheaper to apply and designed for the Swiss reality: SMEs, associations, foundations, pension funds and medium-sized companies. They exist in a “core” version and in a full set for larger organisations.
The difference from the Code of Obligations
The central point is the prohibition of arbitrary hidden reserves. Under the CO you can:
- depreciate beyond what is necessary to reduce taxable profit;
- value inventory on very prudent criteria;
- set up provisions that are not strictly justified.
Under FER all of this is not allowed: assets are valued at their economic value, provisions must correspond to real obligations, revenue is recognised on an accrual basis. The result is a profit and an equity that mirror reality, not tax strategy.
Who must apply them
FER are not mandatory for businesses in general. They become relevant in these cases:
- Listed companies on certain segments of the Swiss stock exchange, where FER or IFRS are required.
- Pension funds (LPP occupational pension institutions), for which FER 26 is the reference standard.
- Associations and foundations of a certain size, often at the request of funders or supervisory authorities.
- Cooperatives and NGOs that want transparency towards their stakeholders.
For an ordinary GmbH or AG, on the other hand, adoption is voluntary: it is chosen when an external counterparty demands it or when it pays to show more credible accounts.
When it pays to adopt them voluntarily
Moving to FER makes sense when transparency becomes a concrete value:
- Opening up the capital: an investor or a fund wants to read numbers not “watered down” by hidden reserves.
- Banking relationships: fair-view financial statements can improve the rating and credit conditions.
- Entry of outside shareholders or a generational handover, where the real value of the company must be clear.
- Growing groups preparing serious consolidated accounts.
The flip side: FER do not reduce taxes. On the contrary, by eliminating hidden reserves they show a profit that is often higher. This is why many SMEs keep their tax accounting under the CO and produce an additional FER report for external stakeholders.
What it involves in practice
Adopting FER means:
- reclassifying the balance sheet according to the scheme required by the standards;
- eliminating hidden reserves and documenting the valuations;
- drawing up a richer set of notes, with accounting principles and explanatory notes;
- ensuring multi-year consistency in the criteria adopted.
It is technical work that requires accounting expertise and a reliable audit: it is not improvised at year-end.
In summary
- The CO allows hidden reserves; FER impose a true and fair view.
- Mandatory for pension funds, some listed companies and various bodies; voluntary for SMEs.
- Useful when transparency towards investors, banks or new shareholders is needed.
- They do not lower taxes: they often show a higher profit.
How we help
We assess whether and when it pays to move to Swiss GAAP FER, manage the transition from the Code of Obligations and produce fair-view reports that are consistent over time. Make your accounting transparent.